The Scottish Government has backed plans to tarmac over 61 acres of farmland for industrial use in West Lothian, despite concerns brownfield sites are lying unused.

The move means that the last open fields of Cousland Farm, between Livingston and the village of Seafield on theĀ  A705, will disappear under a business park.

The council rejected the proposals last August, backing community criticism, and agreeing with the argument that there are already acres of unused light industrial space in the new town and surrounding villages.

However a Reporter appointed by the Scottish Governmentā€™s Division of Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) supported the appeal by Hallam Land Management and Rosebery Estates that the development of Cousland Farm to the north and south of the A705 should be allowed.

He also awarded expenses costs against the council, agreeing with the claimants that the council had  been ā€œunreasonableā€  in rejecting their application. 

Bathgate SNP councillor Willie Boyle won a motion of rejection after highlighting the notorious Freeport shopping centre at West Calder which has lain empty and near derelict for almost 30 years.

Seafield community councilā€™s chairman Damian Byrne said the development would ā€œcompletely ruin the rural atmosphereā€ of the village and its views, from open fields to urban landscape. 

He described the creation of a ā€œdoughnut of derelictionā€ in Livingston with a centre of hollowed out brownfield sites and all new build on the edge of town.

The Scottish Government Reporter, J Alasdair Edwards, in his written submission, conceded that the development would see the loss ā€œof greenfield land and hedgerow, and five individual trees.ā€ 

However he added: ā€œI agree with the results of the appellantā€™s tree survey that the trees to be felled are not of high biodiversity value. Similarly, the hedgerow to be lost has not been identified as being of high value. 

ā€œIn any case, the indicative layout shows new landscape buffers, structural tree planting, amenity grassland and meadow creation which could provide biodiversity improvements and retain wildlife corridors. The final landscape proposals could be suitably controlled by condition. Therefore, the loss of natural resources on the site could be suitably mitigated.ā€

The council earmarked the land for light industrial development as part of its own  Local Development Plan to promote business and employment and thus  planners recommended granting permission.

In August, having  seen ripening crops laying a carpet of colour on the land as it slopes  to the green banks of the river Almond, Councillor Stuart Borrowman, the  chair of the DMC admitted: ā€œOn the site visit I confess, looking south across the fields down to the Almond, itā€™s beautiful. It seems a great shame that the best we can come with is that it should be for industrial development. I donā€™t sense anyoneā€™s heart is in this today.ā€

Councillor Boyle swayed members behind his motion.

He told the August meeting: ā€œThe idea that we desperately need this development site in a greenfield site I have great difficulty with.  The reality is there is vacant property, thereā€™s vacant sites. We have no shortage of vacant sites that can be developed. Freeport is sitting there, and sitting empty. I have serious concerns.ā€

Villagers had argued that open space should be retained for mental health and well-being.Ā 

In his judgement the Reporter said: ā€œThe risks of mental health deterioration are not sufficiently evidenced in this case to suggest that permission should be withheldā€.

He added:Ā  ā€œI appreciate that there are strong concerns regarding development of the appeal site and that construction and a change to the appearance of the area could affect mental health for some.Ā 

ā€œHowever, I consider that overall the indicative layout shows that a high quality environment could be created, amenity safeguarded and views retained.ā€

by Stuart Somerville Local Democracy Reporter

Local Democracy Reporter.

The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) is a public service news agency. It is funded by the BBC, provided by the local news sector (in Edinburgh that is Reach plc (the publisher behind Edinburgh Live and The Daily Record) and used by many qualifying partners. Local Democracy Reporters cover news about top-tier local authorities and other public service organisations.

The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) is a public service news agency. It is funded by the BBC, provided by the local news sector (in Edinburgh that is Reach plc (the publisher behind Edinburgh Live and The Daily Record) and used by many qualifying partners. Local Democracy Reporters cover news about top-tier local authorities and other public service organisations.