A few of the remarks and comments and pointers to articles about the Scottish Independence Referendum that we have found today.
People living in Scotland are invited to vote in the referendum on independence from the United Kingdom on 18 September 2014. The referendum question is “Should Scotland be an independent country?”
Whether you intend voting Yes or No to that question, your views, and those of others, have a place here. We invite comments and we also invite you to write about what you think by using our Submit your Story feature here.
The Financial Times has today published the results of its 2014 survey. Among the questions asked of respondents was:
“How would a yes vote for independence affect the Scottish economy and the rest of the UK in 2014?”
The overwhelming majority of the economists, academics and business leaders who responded to the poll highlighted the risks and uncertainties involved in Scotland leaving the UK. Among those responses:
Ruth Porter, Policy Exchange:
It is difficult to see how an independent Scotland bound by the Bank of England would work. Not only would the end of the Union damage the valuable economic and social integration across the nations involved with untold consequences, but the raft of economically incoherent policies being proposed by Alex Salmond would be disastrous for Scotland specifically.
Charles Goodhart, former MPC member:
The uncertainty up to September will be a minor headwind. If Scotland should vote yes, it would have an adverse effect on the Scottish economy, but not one that would be immediately obvious for a year or two. There would be a minor blip in financial markets in the UK, but that would soon pass.
Professor Chris Pissarides, LSE:
It would not be good for either, especially the Scottish economy. Being part of the UK gives a smaller economy like Scotland’s the assurance that if something goes wrong there will be help forthcoming. The last thing any Scot should wish is to give up the support potentially available from the UK (England?) for support from the European Union under Germany’s rules.
Philip Booth, Institute of Economic Affairs:
The first major problem Scotland will have will be how to deal with a debt of nearly 100 per cent of national income and an ageing population as a new country with no debt servicing record. For that reason, I suspect Scots will be risk averse and not vote for independence!
Erik Nielsen, UniCredit:
A yes vote would cause massive uncertainty as the parties would begin to flesh out how to divide assets and liabilities as well as income streams. Scotland would also face the additional uncertainty of being (at least temporarily) outside the EU, and using a currency with (apparently) no influence on monetary policy. I am somewhat surprised that the market seems to brush aside the risk of a yes-vote.
Commenting on the Survey, Better Together leader Alistair Darling said:-“Scotland benefits enormously from being part of one of the biggest economies in the world. Our companies have a home market of 60 million people to sell to, our currency is one of the oldest and most secure in the world and we are protected from the kind of economic shocks that have affected so many small countries.
“As these independent, impartial experts have highlighted in this survey, the risks involved in leaving the UK are massive. The choice we make will not only impact on our own jobs, pensions and savings – our choice will be felt by the generations who follow us.
“It is absolutely vital that we get this decision right. I believe that we have the best of both worlds in Scotland. We get all the benefits of being part of something bigger and we get to have our own parliament and make our own decisions. We all know from our own lives that we are stronger when we work together. Why on earth would you want to trade strength and security for risk and uncertainty?”
***
The Scottish National Party has today highlighted a “tale of two futures “over the level of fuel poverty in the UK and called upon Westminster to take stronger action as thousands of households continue to face fuel poverty this New Year.
A report has warned that a UK government scheme to improve the energy efficiency of homes could take 30 years to succeed and add to energy prices in the meantime, yet the number of households in fuel poverty in Scotland has fallen.
Whilst 300,000 more households in the UK have been plunged into fuel poverty, the latest figures from the Scottish Government show the number of households in Scotland in fuel poverty have decreased from 721,000 (30.5%) in 2011 to 647, 000 (27.1%) in 2012.
SNP Energy spokesperson Mike Weir MP said:
“The reduction in Scottish households in fuel poverty is a real achievement of the Scottish Parliament which has always taken a much stronger stance on fuel poverty reduction measures than governments at Westminster, but it is completely unacceptable that in the twenty first century in an energy rich country so many Scots are still facing another winter in fuel poverty. The striking difference is a tale of two futures, continuing action from a Scottish Government or foot dragging from Westminster.
“At a time when wages are stagnant or, at best, rising well behind the rate of inflation, energy prices continue on their relentless rise throwing more households into fuel poverty and estimates suggest that for every 1% increase around 40,000 households are plunged into fuel poverty.
“The SNP have stated that in an independent Scotland we would remove the cost of energy efficiency measures from bills and place the cost on central Government funds – reducing bills by 5% or an average of £70 a year.
“The movement to renewable energy will reduce bills in the longer term, rather than depending on ruinously expensive nuclear power, as the UK intends to do.
“The Scottish Government is doing everything it can within its limited powers to provide a wide range of energy efficiency measures to individual households and to local authorities, and that is clearly having a positive effect, but Westminster is failing to keep pace, meaning that too many Scots continue to face fuel poverty. We need the full powers of independence to fully tackle all the causes of fuel poverty.”
The Edinburgh Reporter collates a variety of views on independence which we find across the media.
If you would like to write about your views on independence then please feel free to submit your article using the Submit your Story feature here. The Edinburgh Reporter does not have a stance on the independence question, but hopes to help you make your mind up about the vote on 18 September 2014 by providing as much unbiased coverage as possible.
There are two main websites where you can obtain further information:-
Yes Scotland can be found here
Better Together has a website here
Founding Editor of The Edinburgh Reporter.
Edinburgh-born multimedia journalist and iPhoneographer.
I have lived in England most of my life (rural Herefordshire) and I would urge anyone who cares about Scotland, her values, way of life, infrastructure and environment to vote YES in the referendum. Life here in England has never been more depressing, with an economy driven by a corrupt London-New York banking sector that seeps corruption right through the system to the extent that taxes are not being raised to pay for vital services. The government rules for its own, ignoring the disillusioned, under-employed and debt-ridden underclass, doing everything to increase debt dependency to help prop up the banks (examples: Help to Buy, Pay-day loan soft-touch regulation, failure to clamp-down on tax-evasion ). All the time they stir up hatred of the European Union by blaming the EU for everything via its propaganda machine the BBC, despite the fact that we have by far the worst debt per capita in Europe. At the same time they try wherever they can to draw the U.K into cynical illegal wars (Libya, Syria) and arm Al Quaeda terrorists with hundreds of millions of pounds of our money, acting as a poodle to U.S. aggression and power-grabs around the globe, committing our young working class to illegal war while dressing them up as “heroes”.
At home it is going just as badly. Hospitals are closing, the Post Office is privatised, Police numbers are massively cut, vital council services have been withdrawn and infrastructure is failing. Fuel costs have surged as banks and financial institutions have manipulated commodity prices to make more money out of us for themselves and the government. Bus services in rural areas are reduced and unreliable, further disconnecting struggling people. The roads have become dreadfully-pot-holed as the few, large-scale NFU intensive agriculturalists (I can’t call them farmers) have chosen to evade fuel duty and operator licence fees by hauling all their produce by monster- tractor and trailer instead of lorry, scouring holes in the road and dragging mud routinely onto the pot-holed roads that the council have not got it within their budget to fix. This adds further costs to struggling motorists who have to pay for regular wheel repairs. The smaller-scale, sustainable, caring farmers continue to have costs piled up against them by government bureaucracy that is skewed in favour of the intensive-farming NFU lobby. The government continue to cut environmental regulation, allowing waste criminals and organised crime groups to make millions out of illegal waste sites and waste exports. At the same time they oppose European laws to strengthen protection of the environment (example: neonicotinoid bee-killing pesticides) and they support American GM crop Monsanto in the European courts. They always side with big business, not the environment, such as in the ill-conceived, unscientific and totally unjustifiable culls of badgers. This at the same time as failing to clamp down on some dreadful intensive cattle concentration camps that are perpetrating bovine TB. Although this government is supposed to be a coalition we have been subjected to some of the worst conservative policies I can remember in my lifetime (of 51 years), and the outlook is bleak, with the Cameron spin-machine highly capable of brain-washing the few committed voters via the Press (very subdued since Leveson) into voting it back into power next time. Right-wing English politics is on the march here, with a very strong support across rural England for complete withdrawal from the EU – the only thing that stops us from becoming another state of the U.S.A. Do not be fooled by the current media and political sweet-talk that may lull some Scots into thinking they are loved south of the border. A vote “no” will risk a massive popularist, bullying UK government fiscal backlash against Scotland riding on the wave of success. To my mind an Independent Scotland would lead to a huge correction, or rebalancing of politics in the British Isles away from the City of London, and would be of great benefit to much of England as well as Scotland and Wales. The English view of Scotland and Wales is generally a highly arrogant one – so be warned – seize your big chance and vote YES! (Or face the consequences).
IAN MCCULLOCH
Comments are closed.