Edinburgh Council is at risk of repeating the same mistakes that nearly resulted in the Christmas market being cancelled last year, councillors have warned, after it emerged there could be even less time to find an organiser for this winter.

Plans for the city centre festive village were thrown into chaos in September with the firm awarded the contract walking away from its Ā£5.5million deal with the council over disagreements about the feasibility of proposed attractionsĀ Ā ā€“Ā including a zip wire along George Street.

Another company was brought in at the eleventh-hour to save the market, but the fiasco sparked criticism of the contract tendering process used by the local authority and a debate around how events can be better scrutinised and delivered in the future.

The council has admitted there are lessons to be learned following the difficulties ā€“ but fears have been raised it could run into the same problems again this year.

Unique Assembly stepped in in October to take on the market following the decision by Angels Event Experience (AEE) to pull out of the contract only granted in the summer, which would have paid Ā£5.5million over five years to the council. The contract included the delivery of market stalls and amusements at East and West Princes Street Gardens and other locations in the city centre.

Councillors have yet to decide whether to extend the arrangement with UniqueAssembly for another year or look for a new operator.

But the decision will not be taken until the Culture and Communities Committee on 7 March ā€“ and if councillors then vote against continuing the existing arrangement it would leave even less time than last year to find a new contractor and get plans in place.

The issue was raised at the Finance and Resources committee on Thursday as Cllr Marco Biagi said:Ā ā€œThe tender last year was issued on the 3rd of March, the very first lesson learned is we need to give more time for these decisions to be taken.

ā€œCulture and Communities isnā€™t meeting to discuss next steps until the 7th of March so isnā€™t that going to put them in an incredibly difficult position to take a decision and indeed to learn the biggest lesson of last year?ā€

A report recognised there was a ā€œnarrow timescale between contract award and delivery of Edinburghā€™s Christmas in 2022ā€.

However, it added: ā€œThe contractor only raised concerns about its ability to deliver the agreed outcomes following the award of the contract.

ā€œIn addition, there were some challenges within the internal governance arrangements between the contractor and its partner organisations which may have also contributed to these difficulties.ā€

But Cllr Phil Doggart questioned why adequate ā€œinterrogationā€ of AEE was not carried out before they were confirmed as the preferredĀ bidder.

He said: ā€œWeā€™re expecting [culture and communities committee] to take a decision on the 7th of March around a one year extension.

ā€œIf the recommendation is no, or if the committee says no, then we run into exactly the same problems weā€™ve run into for 2022 and Iā€™m not quite sure how weā€™ve got lessons learned if thatā€™s the case.ā€

Paul Lawrence, executive Director of Place at the council, said even if councillors do decide to look for a different company to run the Christmas market it would be ā€œpossibleĀ for other operators to step inā€.

Mr Lawrence said he had already spoken to other ā€œinterested operatorsā€ and added: ā€œClearly time would be a factor.ā€

Addressing the issues that arose last year, he said: ā€œWe got an offer, we appraised it, we had doubts about the deliverability of some of it but we marked it, it went forward for decision in the way that the procurement exactly should have done.ā€

He said there were some concerns around certain aspects of the bid ā€œbut it was an offer and we had to treat that offer on its merits and thatā€™s what we did”.

ā€œWe did all we could to try and help them deliver what was in the contract,ā€ Mr Lawrence added.

Cllr Biagi said a repeat of the same problems with the Christmas market poses ā€œtremendous reputational risk to the councilā€.

He said scrutiny and oversight of the contract ā€œstopped after the tender was awarded,ā€ adding: ā€œThat seemed to be where it all went wrong.ā€

The Finance committee agreed to bring forward a report providing ā€œfurther detail and reassurance around the procurement brief and processesā€.

Meanwhile officials are mulling over alternative models for the delivery of Edinburghā€™s Christmas, with options including the council running it ā€“ potentially putting an end to outsourcing the festival altogether ā€“ and switching to a ā€˜dialogue basedā€™ tendering process which would allow more discussion and scrutiny of plans before a contract is signed.

Edinburgh’s Christmas PHOTO Unique Assembly Robin Mair

by Donald Turvill

The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) is a public service news agency. It is funded by the BBC, provided by the local news sector (in Edinburgh that is Reach plc the publisher behind Edinburgh Live and The Daily Record and used by many qualifying partners. Local Democracy Reporters cover news about top-tier local authorities and other public service organisations.

+ posts

The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) is a public service news agency. It is funded by the BBC, provided by the local news sector (in Edinburgh that is Reach plc (the publisher behind Edinburgh Live and The Daily Record) and used by many qualifying partners. Local Democracy Reporters cover news about top-tier local authorities and other public service organisations.