Liverpool’s 2025-26 season has taken on an unusual shape. Domestically, they’re stuck in mid-table — sitting 11th with six wins and six losses — and their most recent result, a 3–0 defeat to a struggling Nottingham Forest side, has only deepened the frustration among fans. It’s the kind of inconsistency that’s already influencing everything from supporter expectations to Saturday’s football odds.
Yet, in the Champions League, they look like a completely different team. Arne Slot’s side have won three of their four group games so far, beating Atletico Madrid 3–2, dismantling Eintracht Frankfurt 5–1, and edging Real Madrid 1–0. Their only slip was a narrow 1–0 loss to Galatasaray.
It raises an obvious question: why are Liverpool so convincing in Europe, but so inconsistent in the Premier League?
Slot’s style of play
Slot’s approach is built around fast breakaways, flexible positioning and a well-timed press that disrupts opponents before they can settle. This seems far more naturally suited to the Champions League, as many European teams, specifically in the group stage, tend to leave more space between the lines and commit players forward in possession – an ideal environment for Slot’s approach.
We’ve already seen this play out. Against Frankfurt, Liverpool’s counter-press was razor-sharp, repeatedly winning possession high before turning transitions into goals. Against Atlético, they punished loose passes and positional mistakes in ways they’ve struggled to replicate domestically. Even against Real Madrid, a tighter, more disciplined opponent, Liverpool’s structure looked controlled, organised, and mature.
In contrast, Premier League teams are far more accustomed to intense pressing and physical duels. They’re comfortable defending deep, denying space, slowing Liverpool down, and turning matches into tactical battles rather than transition races. Nottingham Forest did exactly that last weekend: sat compact, hit on the counter, and exposed Liverpool’s inability to break down a low block.
Players thriving with more space in Europe
Several Liverpool players also seem to come alive when matches open up a little more in Europe. Dominik Szoboszlai, Alexis Mac Allister and Ryan Gravenberch all look sharper when they’re given that extra moment to receive the ball and pick their next move. Even Mo Salah has enjoyed more freedom to isolate full-backs on the Champions League stage, something he’s struggled to do in the crowded penalty areas he often faces in the Premier League.
It’s a similar story at the back. Liverpool’s defence has appeared more settled in Europe, with Virgil van Dijk and Ibrahima Konate looking composed in matches where opponents try to build up patiently rather than bombard them with constant physical duels. Premier League attackers press harder, run the channels relentlessly and with more aggression — areas where Liverpool have been tested far more domestically than on European nights.
This contrast is especially striking considering Liverpool are the reigning Premier League champions — a side that proved last season they know exactly how to handle the pace and physical demands of the league. But something is holding them back this year, whether it’s tactical adjustments, disrupted rhythm, or the natural growing pains of adapting to new methods.
—
Liverpool’s contrasting form isn’t a coincidence. Slot’s tactical approach, combined with the squad’s current strengths, simply aligns better with Champions League football than with the physical and tactical demands of the Premier League.
The challenge now is whether they can turn their European confidence into domestic consistency — or whether this will be another season where Europe, once again, takes centre stage at Anfield.
